Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 16 Jun 2012 00:41:29 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 06/16/2012 12:14 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 16, 2012, at 8:37, Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On 06/15/2012 11:23 PM, Jason Bronner wrote:
>>>
>>> If you want it stable, well-documented, and maintained Hylafax is
>>> probably a good route to go for an all-in-one solution.
>>>
>>> http://www.hylafax.org/content/Main_Page
>>
>> I have already have hylafax up and working. It is a *PITA*
>> to send a fax. (I use J Hyla Fax client, which requires me
>> to convert to a post script, fax through Hyla Fax.)
>
> It shouldn't take that much work! I wrote the SunOS and some early Linux ports of that. Anything that Ghostscript can convert to TIFFG3 format should work.
>
> CUPS based programs will have the exact same limitation.
>
>
>>
>> I was hoping for some route that would let me print directly
>> to Hyla fax (or some such) through CUPS.
>>
>> I also have fax4CUPS installed but good luck getting that
>> to work.
>>
>> Thank you for the response,
>> -T
>
Hi Nico,
Linux can be so frustrating at times. It is the most technologically
advanced, well written operating system out there. But lots-of-luck
getting any work done with it. If this was that "ubiquitous" other
operating system, there would be forty millions ways to send a fax.
If I wanted print to hylafax from a Virtual machine to Hylafax
with *THAT* bug riddled mess of an excuse operating system,
I have about forty options.
[editorial comment] AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!![/editorial comment]
I just want to print to fax. AND A FAX NUMBER ADDRESS
BOOK WOULD BE NICE TOO! :'( :'( :'(
-T
|
|
|