SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL on ARM
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Sat, 9 Jun 2012 12:30:04 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Not likely. SL is a rebuild of an upstream vendor's industry
>> class server
>> OS.  If our favorite upstream vendor goes there, then that could happen.
>> But
>> if you look at Fedora as the leading edge of what that vendor plans for
>> the
>> next generation, I see no major pursuit of ARM in the next major
>> release. Do
>> you?
>
> Fedora's considering "upgrading" ARM to a primary architecture for F18:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/830

Moreover, some port RHEL6 to ARM is available:

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/arm/2012-March/002831.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2