SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dennis Schridde <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dennis Schridde <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:54:33 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1089 bytes) , signature.asc (203 bytes)
Hi Matthias and everyone else!

Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 17:21:42 schrieben Sie:
> On 06/08/2012 04:28 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 12:58:53 schrieben Sie:
> >> On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> >>> The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
> >>> vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64,
> 
> Are you sure about this? in fastbugs I see vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_2.1
I haven't had fastbugs enabled and did not check there. Will look there next 
time I think an update is missing! Thanks for the hint!

> > Bug #708657 comment #47 [1] mentions bug #767108 [2] which was closed in
> > January. So it appeared to me as if SL was missing a fix from RHEL for 5
> > months. I am sorry if I misunderstood the meaning of the bugreports.
> 
> They can be tricky at times, and I also got confused by the versions
> mentioned.
Thanks for your explanation!

Generally in RHEL, bugfixes are not included in updates for the current 
release, but only come with the next minor version? If I have non security 
issues with the current release, I have to enable fastbugs?

Kind regards,
Dennis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2