SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dennis Schridde <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dennis Schridde <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:28:59 +0200
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1209 bytes) , signature.asc (203 bytes)
Am Freitag, 8. Juni 2012, 12:58:53 schrieben Sie:
> On 06/08/2012 11:27 AM, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > The version of the package currently available in SL6 is
> > vsftpd-2.2.2-6.el6_0.1.x86_64, while RHEL6 apparently ships
> > vsftpd-2.2.2-11.el6 [1]. Can you please update it, as it contains a bugfix
> > that is important for our systems.
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > Dennis Schridde
> > 
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708657 ("Fixed In
> > Version")
> 
> Please cite properly: "should be fixed in"... and the comment was made
> this night at 03:21:47 EDT.
> 
> What makes you believe that RH has released the fix already? What makes
> you think it has already passed QA?
> 
> Matthias

Bug #708657 comment #47 [1] mentions bug #767108 [2] which was closed in 
January. So it appeared to me as if SL was missing a fix from RHEL for 5 
months. I am sorry if I misunderstood the meaning of the bugreports.

Regarding QA: Bug #708657 changed from ON_QA to VERIFIED in April. I assume 
that means it passed QA? Again I am sorry if I misunderstood the meaning of 
that.

Kind regards,
Dennis Schridde

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708657#c47
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767108

ATOM RSS1 RSS2