On 05/30/2012 04:55 PM, Stefan Lasiewski wrote:
> And for continuity, I'll point out that there was a similar, lengthy
> discussion on this topic in September 2011.
>
> Here is the thread started by Tanmoy Chatterjee:
>
> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1109&L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&T=0&I=-3&X=5E3D186375663BCF45&Y=slasiewski%40lbl.gov&P=26572
Is there any reliable summary of this information, rather like a matrix
that describes characteristics of the relevant EL6 repos?
Examples of matrix columns (assuming the rows lists the repos):
paid professional or volunteer maintained? (E.g., Fermilab/CERN has
paid professional staff assigned to SL)
Timeliness of updates (e.g., only TUV based, or fixes/extensions before
TUV)?
Strict separation of production RPMs from beta RPMs?
Particular emphases?
A matrix or a similar data structure would save all of the time digging
through a threaded discussion.
Yasha Karant