SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 May 2012 11:19:28 +0200
Reply-To:
Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: Difference between the various SL6 repos?
From:
Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Stefan Lasiewski <[log in to unmask]> cc: Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
On 05/30/2012 02:04 AM, Stefan Lasiewski wrote:
> [...]
>
> I am mostly interested in security updates, and am less interested in feature updates. Will the 6.N repositories (6.1,
> 6.2, etc) continue to receive security updates for several years, or should I consider upgrading to the next point
> release (From 6.1 to 6.2, for example) in order to continue receiving security updates?

Security updates will be provided for all minor releases (for example 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, etc).

Cheers,

	Urs

ATOM RSS1 RSS2