On 04/24/2012 11:58 PM, g wrote:
>
> On 04/24/2012 11:02 AM, zxq9 wrote:
>>    From a question on the Japanese mailing list:
>>
>> TUV is committing to a 10 year production lifecycle for 5 and 6. CentOS
>> has now reflected this on their project's lifecycle page. Scientific
>> Linux does not match this.
>
> in a previous post from Connie Sieh;
>
> ++++++++
>   Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:20:13 -0500
>   From: "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 (Santiago) discussion mailing-list"
>       <[log in to unmask]>
>   To: [log in to unmask]
>   Subject: [rhelv6-list] Announcement: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle
>       Extended to Ten Years
>
> Today Red Hat is pleased to announce that it has extended the life cycle of
> Red  Hat Enterprise Linux 5, 6 and future releases from seven to 10 years,
> effective immediately. This announcement is in response to the widespread
> adoption of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 since its introduction in 2007, and
> the increasing rate of adoption of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 since its
> launch in 2010.
> ++++++++
>
> hth.

I take that to mean that SL is similarly extended, then. I suppose the 
project page just hasn't been updated to reflect this.

Thanks for finding that.