SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:47:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
You can do it, it's probably more worth your time to rewrite the apps
though, as you'd just be delaying the time until you needed to upgrade
eventually.

- Rich

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Kevin K <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Depending on what special features you might use on your system (virtualization, third party drivers), it might be possible to build a kernel from kernel.org.  I've tried this in the past but since the latest kernel still didn't properly support the broken hardware I didn't pursue it further.
>
> On Apr 15, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Keith Lofstrom wrote:
>
>> I'm running S.L. 5.6 on a few machines, and have grown somewhat
>> dependent on it.  However, there are features in the kernel
>> that comes with 6.2 (like USB3) which I would like to have.
>>
>> Is it possible to upgrade just the kernel and associated modules
>> and "miscellaneous"?
>>
>> I assume this is tricky, and fraught with dangers, and the usual
>> cautions (make backups, work on a copy of the disk, tweak yum
>> updates so they won't regress the 2.6.32 kernel, etc) apply.
>>
>> For now, I just want to know whether this is worthy of further
>> consideration, or instead I should set aside a few weeks to
>> upgrade everything then rebuild a lot of poorly written custom
>> apps.
>>
>> Keith
>>
>> --
>> Keith Lofstrom          [log in to unmask]         Voice (503)-520-1993
>> KLIC --- Keith Lofstrom Integrated Circuits --- "Your Ideas in Silicon"
>> Design Contracting in Bipolar and CMOS - Analog, Digital, and Scan ICs

ATOM RSS1 RSS2