SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

March 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Scientific Linux 5.8 Alpha 1 Release
From:
Elena Korytko <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Elena Korytko <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:13:23 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines) 
В Птн, 09/03/2012 в 15:11 -0600, Pat Riehecky пишет:
> Scientific Linux "SL 5.8" Alpha 1                         March 9, 2012
> 
...
> - sl-release
> 
>      lsb_release -a now reports the same as SL6.
>      Was $ lsb_release -a -> ScientificSL
>      Is  $ lsb_release -a -> Scientific
>      Please notify us if this change effects you negatively
> 
>      See 
> http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1111&L=SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS&P=R10419
> 
>         sl-release-58-0.sl.rolling.noarch.rpm
> 
> 
> - yum-conf
> 
>     yum-conf-58-0.sl.rolling points to the rolling tree
>     The gpgcheck lines have been modified to be smarter about the jdk rpm
> 
>         yum-conf-58-0.sl.rolling
>         yum-conf-5x-1-10.SL

Seems sl-release-58-0.sl.rolling.src.rpm,
yum-conf-58-0.sl.rolling.src.rpm, and yum-conf-5x-1-10.SL.src.rpm missed
in sl-source repo.

--
Best regards,
Elena

ATOM RSS1 RSS2