On 03/16/2012 08:19 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2012, at 22:21 , Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
>> On 03/15/2012 02:59 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>> On 03/15/2012 02:39 PM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
>>>> Dear developers,
>>>>
>>>> I hate being such a PITR, but have to ask: Is there an ETA for those updates? What's the problem? Yes it's 3.x ->   10.x, but it has been obvious for weeks that this would happen eventually. CentOS got those out 24h ago. What about SL? Any chance we'll see rebuilds at least in {5,6}rolling/testing tomorrow?
>>>>
>>>> Really sorry for having to rant like this,
>>>>     Stephan
>>>>
>>> The updated firefox and thunderbird packages are now available in the sl-testing repo for SL5 and SL6.
>>>
>>> Pat
>> Realized I should have made reference to my earlier email requesting testers on SL 5.7 (http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1203&L=scientific-linux-devel&X=6AF4C024F6837DD3C6&P=1137) as the two are interrelated.
> I had read it, and I try to participate in testing in such cases, whenever possible. Alas, testing 10.0.1 seemed kind of pointless after the 10.0.3 advisories had been issued.
>
>> After sufficient testing has happened of the sl-release update these should be officially released.
> Not sufficient, but our tests so far haven't shown anything serious (SL 5.7, 5.8 Alpha, 6.1, 6.2 - mostly x86_64, but SL5 systems run the 32-bit browser).
>
> The new trigger in sl-release looks good to me, and it works.
>
> The xulrunner update breaks yelp, so that had to be added (taken from 5rolling on 5.7, from fastbugs on 6.1/6.2).
>
> Thanks for all your work,
> 	Stephan
>
I've added yelp into the testing trees.  Thanks for reporting this.

Pat


-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer