Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:53:06 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628
>
> Geeky 2011-06-04 09:02:40 EDT
>
> Also present in RHEL6.1 ! paid, licensed, commercial support
>
> End quote. If necessary, to satisfy the poster, I suppose that the report
> can also be filed against RHEL 6.1, although I personally do not have such
> RH "paid, licensed, commercial support". (Is that needed for posting
> against a licensed-for-fee binary product?)
What should have been done was to clone the Fedora bug as a RHEL bug.
It is easy in bugzilla; just click on the "Clone This Bug" link and
follow the procedure.
Having said that, it looks like the bug for this issue already exists
for RHEL-6 and "being worked on" (Bug 702814). However, like in many
other cases, it is not publicly accessible, so we cannot follow the
progress. The only thing visible to the general public is their
knowledgebase:
https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-49493
Akemi
|
|
|