On 2012/02/26 11:54, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 04:41 AM, jdow wrote:
>> On 2012/02/25 23:08, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>>>> On 2012/02/25 19:59, Todd And Margo Chester wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know of a source of up to date RPMs for Wine?
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>> -T
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/25/2012 09:36 PM, jdow wrote:
>>> > It depends on just HOW up to date you mean:
>>> > Available Packages
>>> > wine.i686 1.2.3-1.el6 epel
>>> > wine.x86_64 1.2.3-1.el6 epel
>>> ...
>>> >
>>> > {^_^}
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> I need at least 1.4rc5. See
>>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18231
>>
>> Tag, you may be "it" for building it, creating the RPMs, and testing it.
>> It appears to be off TUV's radar screen. The flip comment would be "tbanks
>> for volunteering"; but, I figure that's a bit much for this venue.
>>
>> Seriously, I suspect that is what you are going to have to do. Check and
>> see of Fedora has the later material so you can adapt it to SL6. You may
>> need to check to see if that recent a wine version is compatible with the
>> kernel level SL6 uses, too.
>>
>> {O.O}
>>
>
> Just heard back from Andreas Bierfert, the maintainer of
> Wine for FC and RHEL:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AndreasBierfert/Wine
>
> He is planning on supporting 1.4 or 1.4.1 when it
> 1.4 gets out of the RC phase. So, patience is now
> the issue.
>
> -T

Todd, doesn't that mean you can look for those versions of Wine in SL7, maybe?

{o.o}