SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Xen for both 32 and 64 bit systems.
From:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Steven Haigh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:09:43 +1100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (952 bytes) , smime.p7s (4 kB) 
I use Michael Young's packages for Xen based on Fedora 16. Anything 
newer than that starts to cause issues in building due to newer 
dependencies. I then rebuild these for EL6. At least when I tried it not 
long ago as an experiment.

Eventually, when FC16 becomes unmaintained, I shall either maintain it 
manually or start creating them manually from the xen sources.

--
Steven Haigh

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299

On 21/02/2012 2:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Regarding the Xen for SL 6: I note that the xen-4.1.2-8.fc17.src.rpm
> from the bleeding edge Fedora 17 test repository seems to compile well
> using "mock" for Scientific Linux 6: I don't have a good host to test it
> on, but backporting those might be a good way to provide access to this.
> Building customized relese 3.x kernels to get the published Xen patches
> integrated, that's a whole different ball of wax.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2