6.2 is in its final release.

Where are you still seeing 6.1 as the latest on the website?  I forgot 
to publish the 'news' update, but thought I'd gotten all the other 
references.

The mirrors list has been notified of the release.

Pat

On 02/16/2012 09:43 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> OK, so if I am specifically using a 6.1 repo, my host will stay where 
> it is then. Second question, is this the final release? The web site 
> and mirrors still have 6.1 listed, just want to confirm before I start 
> downloading.
>
> Thanks
> Jolynn
>
> On Feb 16, 2012 10:01am, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > 6.2 and 6x
> >
> >
> >
> > On 02/16/2012 08:56 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> >
> >
> > What repo do the new RPM's show up in?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Feb 16, 2012 9:35am, Pat Riehecky [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > > On 02/15/2012 05:38 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > On 16/02/2012 8:01 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Release Notes for Scientific Linux 6.2 February 15 2012
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The full release notes are available at
> >
> > >
> >
> > > http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/6x/62/
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Excellent work guys!
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I would just like to confirm if my understanding on one matter is 
> correct... If a system follows the sl6x repos, will this automatically 
> update to 6.2 as the packages hit the mirrors?
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I started life with SL at 6.1 - so I've never gone through the 
> minor version change with SL before.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Correct, any system on the 6x repos should update on its own to 6.2
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > (one of my boxes did so last night, so I'm confident it is working 
> fine)
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Pat
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > --
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Pat Riehecky
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Scientific Linux Developer
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Pat Riehecky
> >
> > Scientific Linux Developer
> >
> >
> > 


-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer