SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:01:17 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
6.2 and 6x

On 02/16/2012 08:56 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> What repo do the new RPM's show up in?
>
> On Feb 16, 2012 9:35am, Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > On 02/15/2012 05:38 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 16/02/2012 8:01 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> >
> >
> > Release Notes for Scientific Linux 6.2 February 15 2012
> >
> >
> >
> > The full release notes are available at
> >
> > http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/6x/62/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Excellent work guys!
> >
> >
> >
> > I would just like to confirm if my understanding on one matter is 
> correct... If a system follows the sl6x repos, will this automatically 
> update to 6.2 as the packages hit the mirrors?
> >
> >
> >
> > I started life with SL at 6.1 - so I've never gone through the minor 
> version change with SL before.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Correct, any system on the 6x repos should update on its own to 6.2
> >
> >
> >
> > (one of my boxes did so last night, so I'm confident it is working fine)
> >
> >
> >
> > Pat
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Pat Riehecky
> >
> > Scientific Linux Developer
> > 


-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2