SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
CJ Keist <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:37:42 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Thanks, but they look the same:

Older server:
[root@web2 yum.repos.d]# yum repolist all
repo id           repo name                                       status
sl                Scientific Linux 6.1 - x86_64 
enabled: 6,251
sl-debuginfo      Scientific Linux Debuginfo                      disabled
sl-fastbugs       Scientific Linux 6.1 - x86_64 - fastbug updates disabled
sl-security       Scientific Linux 6.1 - x86_64 - security update 
enabled:   847
sl-source         Scientific Linux 6.1 - Source                   disabled
sl-testing        Scientific Linux Testing - x86_64               disabled
sl-testing-source Scientific Linux Testing - Source               disabled
repolist: 7,098

Newer server:
[root@web1 ~]# yum repolist all
repo id           repo name                                       status
sl                Scientific Linux 6.1 - x86_64 
enabled: 6,251
sl-debuginfo      Scientific Linux Debuginfo                      disabled
sl-fastbugs       Scientific Linux 6.1 - x86_64 - fastbug updates disabled
sl-security       Scientific Linux 6.1 - x86_64 - security update 
enabled:   847
sl-source         Scientific Linux 6.1 - Source                   disabled
sl-testing        Scientific Linux Testing - x86_64               disabled
sl-testing-source Scientific Linux Testing - Source               disabled
repolist: 7,098


On 1/19/12 9:26 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:15 AM, CJ Keist<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>> I have two identical servers. One I install SL 6.1 last month.  Today I have
>> install SL 6.1 on the second server.  On the newest server when you issue:
>>
>> yum search all freetds
>> Warning: No matches found for: freetds
>> No Matches found
>>
>> On the older server if finds freetds:
>>
>> yum search freetds
>> ============================= N/S Matched: freetds
>> =============================
>> freetds-devel.x86_64 : Header files and development libraries for freetds
>> freetds.x86_64 : Implementation of the TDS (Tabular DataStream) protocol
>>
>>   Name and summary matches only, use "search all" for everything.
>>
>> I check the yum conf files and they are the same between the two servers?
>>   I'm stumped.
>
> I suspect that on your older server you have one (or more) of the
> rpmforge/epel/atrpms repos enabled. Check with:
>
> yum repolist all
>
> Akemi

-- 
C. J. Keist                     Email: [log in to unmask]
Systems Group Manager           Solaris 10 OS (SAI)
Engineering Network Services    Phone: 970-491-0630
College of Engineering, CSU     Fax:   970-491-5569
Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301

All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness'

ATOM RSS1 RSS2