Hi Orion Poplawski!

 On 2012.01.13 at 10:18:40 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote next:

> >It looks like the rebuilt nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.0.sl6 package is incorrectly
> >linked. I am repeatedly getting segfaults in rpc.gssd:
> >
> >Jan 12 14:25:12 vincent kernel: rpc.gssd[12580]: segfault at 600 ip
> >00007fcbebd4c1fc sp 00007fff1b03d570 error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7fcbebcd7000+197000]
> >
> >Reverting to the earlier rebuilt nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6 fixes the issue. The
> >original nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6 however also segfaulted.
> >
> >Jonathan
> 
> Seen here too.

Does anyone use kerberized nfs4 in SL6.1? Ever since 6.1, nfs-utils were
broken for me; version 1.2.3-6 introduced " Added support for AD style
kerberos to rpc.gssd (bz 671474)" which completely broke kerberized nfs4
server when accessed from linux hosts (no AD in question). All versions
of nfs-utils since then had same bug, so I had to rollback to freshest
nfs-utils that work - one from 6.1 beta, nfs-utils-1.2.3-4.el6.x86_64.rpm
and locked updates of this package in yum.conf.

It wasn't rpc.gssd segfault or anything like that, it's just that with
that "AD style support" krb principal in rpc.gssd was appearing with
wrong realm name or something like that, and it refused to give access
to linux clients.

I wonder if modern versions of nfs-utils overcame this problem and
kerberized nfs works for anyone with new nfs-utils, and it's worth
upgrading?

-- 

Vladimir