SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:29:50 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Bluejay Adametz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Is there anyone who has/had SL-6 machines running > 200 days ?
>
> I've got one that's been running for 252 days. 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.i686.
>
>> There is a kernel bug that causes a system crash when the uptime goes
>> over 208.5 days. This was noted by an Scientific Linux user on the SL
>> Japanese mailing list [1].
> ---
>>has an overflow. cyc * per_cpu(cyc2ns, cpu) exceeds 64 bits, causing
>>the final value to become zero.
>
> Is the problem only on 64-bit machines? The one I have at 252 days
> uptime is 32-bit.

According to what I've read, (1) the bug occurs on both 32-bit and
64-bit machines;  (2) virtual machines are not affected; (3) only the
Intel CPU (Pentium4 or newer) is relevant.

Akemi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2