SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bluejay Adametz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Bluejay Adametz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:07:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> Is there anyone who has/had SL-6 machines running > 200 days ?

I've got one that's been running for 252 days. 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.i686.

> There is a kernel bug that causes a system crash when the uptime goes
> over 208.5 days. This was noted by an Scientific Linux user on the SL
> Japanese mailing list [1].
---
>has an overflow. cyc * per_cpu(cyc2ns, cpu) exceeds 64 bits, causing
>the final value to become zero.

Is the problem only on 64-bit machines? The one I have at 252 days
uptime is 32-bit.

                                                         - Bluejay Adametz

"There's nothing like an airport for bringing you
down to earth." - Richard Gordon
NOTICE: This message, including any attachments, is only for the use of 
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged 
information, or information otherwise protected from disclosure by law.  
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying, dissemination or 
distribution of this message or any of its attachments is strictly 
prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please contact the 
sender immediately by reply email and destroy this message, including all 
attachments, and any copies thereof. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2