SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: REISSUE - Security ERRATA Low: nfs-utils on SL6.x i386/x86_64
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:30:54 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
On 01/11/2012 02:27 PM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
>> Did you try the package placed in testing a little ways back?  It is
>> nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.0, I tried a number of mount scenarios and
>> didn't get any segfaults with it.  I had several people report
>> positively on it.
> I never tried the sl-testing version. I'm using the version from
>
> http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.1/x86_64/updates/security/nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.0.sl6.x86_64.rpm
>
> I assumed that *was* the testing version, that had tested ok and
> migrated to updates.

Sorry about that, I flopped a line while reading your email.

You are correct, you were using the version I was suggesting.

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2