SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2012

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:22:12 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On 01/11/2012 02:15 PM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
>> A new version of nfs-utils (nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.0.sl6) has been
>> posted in the Scientific Linux testing repository.  The only
>> difference between it and the existing one is an incremented version
>> number.  If testing verifies it works as expected it may be placed in
>> the security tree.
> If I upgrade from the (fixed) nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.x86_64 rpm to this
> version on otherwise up-to-date SL 6.1 x86_64 systems, the umount.nfs
> segfault issue is back:
>
>    umount.nfs[18630]: segfault at 19 ip 00007f605615653a sp 00007fffd63705c0 error 4 in libc-2.12.so[7f60560df000+197000]
>
> It only seems to occur with NFS mounts served from a RHEL 5.7 x86_64 system.
> There is no problem with unmounting mounts served from a RHEL 6.1 x86_64
> NFS system.
>
> This behaviour persists after a reboot.
>
> Downgrading back to nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.x86_64 makes the issue go
> away again.

Did you try the package placed in testing a little ways back?  It is 
nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6.0, I tried a number of mount scenarios and didn't 
get any segfaults with it.  I had several people report positively on it.

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2