SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

December 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pat Riehecky <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:07:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
On 12/19/2011 09:07 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 14:40 , Morten Stevens wrote:
>
>> On 17.12.2011 03:30, Steven Haigh wrote:
>>> I noticed that all my SL6x systems have updated to the following
>>> selinux packages overnight:
>>> selinux-policy           noarch  3.7.19-126.el6 sl6x-security  771 k
>>> selinux-policy-targeted  noarch  3.7.19-126.el6 sl6x-security  2.5 M
>>>
>>> In the email logs on every system I notice:
>>> SELinux:  Could not downgrade policy file
>>> /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24, searching for an older
>>> version.
>>> SELinux:  Could not open policy file<=
>>> /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.24:  No such file or directory
>>> load_policy:  Can't load policy:  No such file or directory
>>>
>>> As I usually disable SELinux on all my systems, I'm not sure if this
>>> will have any effect for those who still run with SELinux enabled -
>>> but it seems strange so I thought I'd report it...
>> This is an upstream bug... I see this error message on all my systems.
> Hmm... I don't observe this on my systems, whether or not SELinux is disabled.
>
> 	Stephan
>
I will echo Stephan's observations on this.  I checked 4 systems (2 - 
i386, 2 - x86_64; one enforcing one disabled for each arch) and I was 
unable to generate the error listed.

Pat

-- 
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

ATOM RSS1 RSS2