SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

December 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Akemi Yagi <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:01:39 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Farkas Levente <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 08:51 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>> Updated packages for nfs-utils posted for testing at
>>
>> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/testing/i386/
>> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/testing/x86_64/
>>
>> These packages should not segfault in the manner that the current
>> packages do.  If it does continue to segfault, or operate in an
>> unexpected manner, please let me know.
>>
>> To test these you will need to downgrade to a version earlier than
>> nfs-utils-1.2.3-15.el6 (yum downgrade nfs-utils), enable the testing
>> repository, and install nfs-utils from there.  Once installed you can
>> disable the testing repo.
>>
>> Or you can just run the following commands
>>
>> yum -y downgrade nfs-utils
>> yum -y --enablerepo=sl-testing update nfs-utils
>
> is it an upstream fix or sl modified one?

This SL post/thread has more details:

http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1112&L=scientific-linux-users&T=0&P=16967

Akemi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2