Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:08:39 +0200 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> RPMforge provides already the (beta) 64bit flash-plugin, so there's no
>> need to wait for it. In this case the 64bit is installed, so there is no
>> reason to install the 32bit. Unless you want to replace the 64bit by the
>> 32bit.
>
> Hmm. Unless I am using an out of date mirror RPMforge has
> flash-plugin.x86_64 11.0.1.129-0.1.el6.rf rpmforge
>
> whereas the adobe-linux-i386 repo has
> flash-plugin.i386 11.0.1.152-release @adobe-linux-i386
> (Build Date: Sat 24 Sep 2011 02:45:27 AM BST).
So, why would one replace a 64bit flash-plugin with a 32bit one ?
If the 64bit version was used, it simply would have worked.
--
-- dag wieers, [log in to unmask], http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, [log in to unmask], http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
|
|
|