SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: sl6.1 and sl6x
From:
jdow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
jdow <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:45:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
On 2011/09/18 10:00, Yasha Karant wrote:
> A small side question: if SL6X happens to be pointing to SL6.m for some m
> (currently 2), after the update/enhancement will the target now display SL6.m as
> the installed release?

Yes. That is what happened here upgrading from 6.0-6.1 via Yum.
 > cat /etc/issue
Scientific Linux release 6.1 (Carbon)
Kernel \r on an \m

{^_^}

ATOM RSS1 RSS2