You are correct -- the application built and seems to run using the 
files contained in the zip file when unzipped (using linux unzip) into 
the same directory from which one is building mupdf.  I have not yet 
tested it with xps files but with PDF files.

Should the built/made application be packaged as an installable RPM (and 
source RPM using the sources supplied) for convenience of other users?

Yasha Karant

On 09/17/2011 10:32 AM, Stephen Isard wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:54:25 -0700, Yasha Karant<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>
>> I tried the binary executables of mudpf for linux on 5.7, but the glibc
>> is not compatible.
>
> Yes, I found that too.
>
>> I then tried to make from source:
>>
>> [ykarant@localhost mupdf-0.9] make
>>      MKDIR build/debug
> (snip)
>>      CC build/debug/dev_text.o
>> fitz/dev_text.c:8:10: error: #include expects "FILENAME" or<FILENAME>
>> fitz/dev_text.c: In function ‘fz_text_extract_span’:
>> fitz/dev_text.c:324: warning: implicit declaration of function
>> ‘FT_Get_Advance’
>> make: *** [build/debug/dev_text.o] Error 1
>>
>> Also, no go.  What did you do differently?
>
> You don't mention getting the third party libraries at
> http://www.mupdf.com/download/mupdf-thirdparty.zip as instructed in the
> README.  I did and unzipped them in the mupdf-0.9 directory.  Apart from
> that, I just did "make" the way you did.
>
> Stephen Isard