On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is there any difference between Sl6.1 and SL6x repositories? Do I need
>>>> to enable only of these two or both?
>>>
>>> sl6x is a symbolic link to the "current" release. =C2=A0So at the moment
>>> =
>>
>> sl6x
>>>
>>> points to sl6.1 since sl6.1 is the current release. =C2=A0When we
>>> release=
>>
>> sl6.2
>>>
>>> then sl6x will point to sl6.2 .
>>>
>>> So you need to pick 1 . =C2=A0If you pick sl6x you will updated via the
>>> y=
>>
>> um cron
>>>
>>> job to the "next" release when it is released.
>>
>> Thanks for the elaboration - so it is a good idea to enable the SL6x
>> repositories instead of SL6.1.
>
> That is what do .
>
>> One more thing I want to know is "fastbugs" updates are safe to install?
>
> They follow TUV Fastrack channel.  So they are released so they should be ok
> to install.
Thanks again.
>
> -Connie Sieh
>
>>>
>>> -Connie Sieh
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any suggetion.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>