Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:14:47 -0500 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any difference between Sl6.1 and SL6x repositories? Do I need
>>> to enable only of these two or both?
>>
>> sl6x is a symbolic link to the "current" release. =C2=A0So at the moment =
> sl6x
>> points to sl6.1 since sl6.1 is the current release. =C2=A0When we release=
> sl6.2
>> then sl6x will point to sl6.2 .
>>
>> So you need to pick 1 . =C2=A0If you pick sl6x you will updated via the y=
> um cron
>> job to the "next" release when it is released.
> Thanks for the elaboration - so it is a good idea to enable the SL6x
> repositories instead of SL6.1.
That is what do .
> One more thing I want to know is "fastbugs" updates are safe to install?
They follow TUV Fastrack channel. So they are released so they should be
ok to install.
-Connie Sieh
>>
>> -Connie Sieh
>>>
>>> Thanks for any suggetion.
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|