SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:14:47 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (37 lines)
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any difference between Sl6.1 and SL6x repositories? Do I need
>>> to enable only of these two or both?
>>
>> sl6x is a symbolic link to the "current" release. =C2=A0So at the moment =
> sl6x
>> points to sl6.1 since sl6.1 is the current release. =C2=A0When we release=
> sl6.2
>> then sl6x will point to sl6.2 .
>>
>> So you need to pick 1 . =C2=A0If you pick sl6x you will updated via the y=
> um cron
>> job to the "next" release when it is released.
> Thanks for the elaboration - so it is a good idea to enable the SL6x
> repositories instead of SL6.1.

That is what do .

> One more thing I want to know is "fastbugs" updates are safe to install?

They follow TUV Fastrack channel.  So they are released so they should be 
ok to install.

-Connie Sieh

>>
>> -Connie Sieh
>>>
>>> Thanks for any suggetion.
>>>
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2