Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:36:27 -0500 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Andrew Z wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, Andrew Z wrote:
>>
>> --e89a8f642af2c9ac9804ac3caf72
>>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Andrew Z <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> i'm setting up my laptop for mock and why looking thru the
>>>>> /etc/mock/epel-6-x86_64.cfg i noticed that "updates" repo points to
>>>>>
>>>> centos
>>>>
>>>>> server list.
>>>>>
>>>>> question:
>>>>> 1. what's the right repo for updates?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Mock from EPEL is easily reconfigured to point to a local Scietifidic
>>>> Linux repository: that's how I use it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> dumier question - what's "fastbugs" are?
>>>
>>
>> fastbugs are similar to "FastTrack" from TUV. They are rpms that mostly
>> have bug fixes and probably will be in the next point release.
>>
>> -Connie Sieh
>>
>
> Connie,
> thank you for clrification. What's the difference between "updates" and
updates are at security fixes .
> "bug fixes"? I tend to think it's (almost) the same?
> Andrew
>
-Connie Sieh
|
|
|