SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

August 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:52:43 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (36 lines)
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Pat Riehecky wrote:

> On 08/30/2011 08:13 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I'm wondering if there are any official ways to report bugs with SL?
>> 
>> I'd love to get involved in this and assist in at least the
>> administration side of things - even if I can't help diagnose and fix bugs.
>> 
>> Is there a SL bugzilla or similar to report issues on? I'd certainly
>> like to see whats happening with the installation DVDs requiring a
>> working network connection - something thats almost worthwhile
>> re-spinning the DVDs for...
>> 
> Hello Steven,
>
> For SL specific bugs, this list is typically the first stop.  If you've found 
> a bug in software from TUV, its best to note it on their bugzilla ( 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ ).  We typically suggest not making references 
> to Scientific Linux on their site as rebuilds are a somewhat sore subject for 
> them with what Oracle has been doing.
>
> On the whole, if your unsure if it is SL or TUV, this list is full of people 
> who simply want to see Linux run beautifully and can, hopefully, point you in 
> the right direction.
>
> Pat
>

In this case the "bug" is only with SL.  So you have reported it.

Thanks

-Connie Sieh

ATOM RSS1 RSS2