SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: MUA specifics
From:
William Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
William Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:06:56 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
On 6 July 2011 15:34, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, William Scott wrote:
>
>> If a new subject does not carry over the "In-Reply-To:" header from
>> the original post then all should be fine.
>
> Your message also had a "References:" header

I would expect it to as it was a reply to this thread.

I didn't quote any existing text as it was a standalone comment.

>  In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
>  References: <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
> which appears to provide information that threaders might use.
>
> I'd recommend removing those headers too.
>
> http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html describes one threading algorithm
>
> --
> Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison         Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
> [log in to unmask]   http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2