SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

July 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:03:12 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Matthias Schroeder wrote:

> Hi Connie, Troy et al.,
>
> I just noticed that SL5 has numpy version 1.0.4-1, whereas EPEL's numpy is 
> now at 1.2.1-2.el5. EPEL also has a version of matplotlib that requires 
> features of the newer numpy (numpy.ma), but without having a proper version 
> in the rpm requirement.
>
> This gives problems on all nodes that use protectbase, since they will not 
> update the version of numpy coming from SL5.
>
> Can you provide a newer numpy version in SL to fix this problem?

There is one in 
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/56/x86_64/SL/numpy-1.2.1-1.x86_64.rpm

> I guess using the epel version would be a good move.

SL doesn't change packages from those supplied by RHEL except with
a *very* good reason.
Gratuitously throwning epel packages in would make me very unhappy.

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2