SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Jul 2011 13:02:43 -0700
Reply-To:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: Is ip_conntrack_ftp superceeded?
From:
Todd And Margo Chester <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Todd And Margo Chester 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>    In CentOS 5.x I have had to use
>>
>>         /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config
>>         IPTABLES_MODULES=ip_conntrack_ftp
>>
>> to get active mode ftp to work with my iptables
>> firewall
>>
>> In SL6, ip_conntrack_ftp is nowhere to be found, but
>> active mode ftp still seems to work.  Has ip_conntrack_ftp
>> been gobbled up into iptables?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> -T
>>
On 07/04/2011 10:53 PM, curriegrad2004 wrote:
> it's nf_nat_ftp in SL6.

Thank you!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2