SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Jul 2011 00:12:44 +0100
Reply-To:
JR van Rensburg <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
JR van Rensburg <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Comments:
To: Thomas Bendler <[log in to unmask]> cc: SL users <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 00:53 +0200, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> Hi Yasha,
> 
> 2011/7/2 Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
>         [...]
>         I too agree and was rather surprised to find this much
>         discourse on the subject on a professional list, 

snip

> everyone has personal flavors but they might not be correct. Please
> read the relevant RFC (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html), this is
> something the where the community already made a commitment back in
> 1995 (two years after I started writing to new groups and mailing
> lists) and this is something that worked well since then. So I
> understood your point of view (and maybe the view of your colleagues),
> but this is not what is committed in the community for nearly to
> decades.

Ah, but you have to admit it got everyone's juices flowing - I've never
seen a thread attract so much traffic in such a short space of time. ;)
Perhaps it was seen as a welcome break and a thread to let off steam on
all sides of the argument, something a list server was not designed to
do.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2