SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:07:37 -0400
Reply-To:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
Re: [question] Cycles of SL
From:
Tom H <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Pere Casas Puig <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I'm new to the community and the list.
> I have thought about replacing the operating system of
> my servers by SL6. But I'm really concerned about the life cycles of SL.
> SL has 3 years of support?
> Is this correct?
> Does version 6 will not support in 2014?

7 years.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2