SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

July 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailling list for Scientific Linux users worldwide <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:21:11 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Subject:
From:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
On 07/26/2011 07:10 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Andrew Z<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>
>> Not to hijack the topic, but the NTFS module is also seemed to be absent
>> (I'm on x64). hmmm...
>
> This is indeed off topic here (so I changed the Subject line). :)
>
> 'No NTFS support' is upstream's decision. But it is fairly easy to
> implement thanks to 3rd party repos. This CentOS wiki is helpful:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/NTFS
>
> Akemi

I have just done what Akemi claims to have done in the message below: 
changed the Subject line.

Was the thread produced by Akemi hijacked?

Is this thread hijacked?

If the thread for Akemi was NOT hijacked and merely changed the subject 
line, but mine is hijacked when I did the same, can anyone explain why?

If the thread for Akemi was hijacked, are the complainers going to post 
a complaint?  I am not being a "troll", "ogre", "balrog", "orc" or any 
other mythical character -- but trying to understand the technical 
mechanics of posting in a change of topic based upon related email to SL.

Yasha Karant

ATOM RSS1 RSS2