SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephen John Smoogen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:09:28 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 14:39, Todd And Margo Chester
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Under SL6, are we stuck with Firefox 3.6?  Is there some plan
> to support Firefox 4 in our future?  (I have just been using the
> binary under CentOS 5.6.)

I think this was asked earlier with 5.x. Scientific Linux is based off
the upstream of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. Upgrading from 3.x to 4.x
requires a LOT of other package rebuilds and updates.. so it would be
less likely to occur. For people wanting to use it, I would recommend
using the seperate rpms from remi or local binaries.

> Many thanks,
> -T
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren

ATOM RSS1 RSS2