SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SHA256SUM file lists 6.1, not 6.0.
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:26:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines) 
On 06/06/2011 05:59 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just been made aware of a problem with the SHA256SUM file at:
> http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/
>
> File listing is as follows:
> SHA1SUM
> SHA256SUM
> SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso
> SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD2.iso
> SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Install-DVD.iso
> SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-boot.iso
> SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-07-LiveCD.iso
> SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-07-LiveDVD.iso
> SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-07-LiveMiniCD.iso
> readme
>
> It seems the SHA1SUM lists the correct files, however the SHA256SUM
> shows 6.1 images:
> 590fd1993441556fc9f3879395d623162d42d2f9171dafab7453d343c24c13c8
> SL-61-x86_64-2011-05-31-boot.iso
> 7ed319c6a98ddced4b72e4d48cbdea7fc5f1046749458771c9eb6f2770f5d752
> SL-61-x86_64-2011-05-31-Install-DVD.iso
>
> The same seems to apply for the i386 images.
>
> Can someone please correct this?
>

Fixed ... and investigating why it happened, so it won't happen again.
Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2