This has to be Raid-ed though. I would suggest you are using some sort
of hardware Raid as I've never heard of a disk that is 10TB. I thought
the max we are up to these days is 3.
On 06/06/11 12:25, Sunil M. Dogra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is output pf fdisk -l. aslo I am not using any RAID.
>
> With Best Regards
> sunil
>
> fdisk -l
>
>
>
> Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 146.7 GB, 146778685440 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17844 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 * 14001 15000 8032500 83 Linux
> /dev/cciss/c0d0p2 1 4000 32129968+ 82 Linux
> swap / Solaris
> /dev/cciss/c0d0p3 4001 10000 48195000 83 Linux
> /dev/cciss/c0d0p4 10001 14000 32130000 5 Extended
> /dev/cciss/c0d0p5 10001 14000 32129968+ 83 Linux
>
> Partition table entries are not in disk order
>
> Disk /dev/cciss/c0d1: 10001.7 GB, 10001711325184 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1215972 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/cciss/c0d1p1 1 267350 2147483647+ ee EFI GPT
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:38 AM, jdow <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Can you cut and paste the fdisk -l output into an email? It can tell
> you a lot about what the drives really amount to.
>
> Are you running it as a RAID with checksum or simply striping? Your
> numbers suggest something like RAID 6.
>
> This is the system I am currently prepping to use as a name server,
> firewall, and email tool for a two person multi-computer (and a lot
> of "gadgets") network here.
>
> Disk /dev/sda: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders
>
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x00007e83
>
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sda1 * 1 64 512000 83 Linux
> Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
> /dev/sda2 64 60802 487873536 8e Linux LVM
>
> The header portion is REALLY interesting. It's a 500 gigabyte
> drive. But, it's only 488386584 1k blocks, 476940 1 meg blocks, or
> 465 1 gigabyte blocks when speaking of 1024 byte entities rather
> than 1000 byte entities.
>
> Your 12 1 terabyte disks striped array is only 10.91 TeraBytes
> in computer speak - 1024 per K rather than 1000 per k. Could
> that explain your discrepancy?
>
> {^_^} Joanne (First explained this to others in 1986. IMAO
> disks should be advertised both ways for clarity.)
>
>
> On 2011/06/05 22:11, Sunil M. Dogra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ans: / = ~45GB
> /boot =~2GB
> /swap =~16GB
>
>
> I have another question
>
> why gparted, fdisk -l, system-config-lvm are giving different
> outputs for
> 12TB but giving the same output for 500GB
>
> With Regards
> sunil
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:28 AM, jdow <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> <mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> wrote:
>
> On 2011/06/03 06:47, Alec T. Habig wrote:
>
> James Holland writes:
>
> Don't know why this is... But check how big your
> other partitions
> are using gparted.
>
>
> Could it be that he's comparing the "1TB" drives he's
> bought (which are
> marketed as decimal 1x10^12 bytes) with the expected
> (binary) 2^40
> bytes?
>
> That's a 10% reduction in perceived space. If the disk
> format has also
> reserved the traditional (and now obsolete) 10% for root
> use only, then
> suddenly we're 2.5 TB down from what one would naively
> expect after
> clicking on "Newegg, please send me 12 terabyte drives".
>
> gparted will show the whole capacity (ignoring this root
> reserve), but
> "df" won't.
>
>
> How big are /, /boot, and /swap?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> (I'm old fashioned and silly, I like "/dev/fdisk -l /dev/sda
> >foo" as
> a way of exporting the actual partitioning. I am not sure
> fdisk would
> be happy with 12 TB, though. But showing us the actual
> partitioning
> might be a good idea.)
>
> {o.o} Joanne. (Imprinted on the old tools back in about
> '88 on of
> all things "Amiga Unix.")
>
>
>
|