SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:54:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
If you do this your machine will eventually become SL 6.1. and stay that 
way.
This is because sl-release-6.1-0.1.rolling will eventually become
sl-release-6.1-1 at the release candidate stage.  That will switch your 
yum repositories to point to 6.1 instead of 6rolling.

Troy

On 06/03/2011 12:02 PM, Chris Tooley wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> If I do this, will that mean I will need to switch *back* to 6.1 at a
> future date, or will it consistently be 6rolling, ala a test branch?
>
> On 11-06-02 1:04 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> rpm -Uvh
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/Packages/sl-release-6.1-0.1.rolling.x86_64.rpm
>


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2