On Thursday 30 June 2011 12:30:08 Alexander Hunt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm not seeing any issue with threading here; all of the subject lines
> in Yashas emails are relevant to the topic in the body. Just for info I
> use Thunderbird as well, but the sl-security version.
> 
> Regards to all,
> 
> Alex
> 
Here is the offending header portion:

To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
 Subject: How to use a local SL 6 printer with VirtualBox MS Win XP Pro
 References: 
<[log in to unmask]> 
<[log in to unmask]><[log in to unmask]>

--> In-reply-to: <[log in to unmask]> <---

Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list

----

It's just good practice to create a new email and not reply wiping the 
information out, as it not all email clients work in the same manner.
Much like sending HTML messages to a listserv.

/Dan


> snip:
> 
> I wasn't going to nitpick but as this is the second time in as many days I
> have noticed it, can you please start a new thread(Subject) with your
> questions?
> 
> I don't know what is happening, but my guess is you are replying to a
> thread
> and just changing the subject.
> 
> Examples:
> In Kmail this subject is being threaded under the original "ntp-perl"
> subject
> and another(Your USB3 question) is in the "Virtualization question"
> subject.
> 
> On 06/30/2011 10:13 AM, Beartooth Comcast wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Yasha Karant wrote:
> >> What is the list etiquette concerning interspersed replies (post 1
> >> paragraph A, post 2 reply after A, post 1 paragraph B, post 2 reply
> >> after B, etc., with recursive iteration)?  Such an approach often
> >> provides real information indexing issues with threaded lists.
> >>
> >> I use IA-32 Linux Thunderbird current (3.1.11); [....]
> >
> >     How committed are you to Tbird? I've been unable to find an rpm
> > for Pan that doesn't hit dependency hell with SL; if there is one, you
> > might want to give it a try instead.
>