SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Yasha Karant <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:06:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
My apologies, you completely are correct.  I misunderstood the question 
to apply to the production release (that already has happened at RH).  I 
personally never test or develop a beta release of a system or system 
software on a production platform, but rather on a beta testing hardware 
platform dedicated for the purpose, and on these, a full (re-)install 
always is done.

Yasha Karant

On 06/23/2011 10:53 AM, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:48:59AM -0700, Yasha Karant wrote:
>
>> I am very confused about one statement you make:
>> Systems should be reinstalled from scratch after the release though.
>
> Upgrading from a BETA to a FINAL release has never been supported
> for RHEL and I think this is meant here.  So, this message was not
> about 6.0 to 6.1, but about 6.1beta to 6.1, AFAICS.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2