SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alec T. Habig" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alec T. Habig
Date:
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:58:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Yasha Karant writes:
> a minor release could be handled through the distribution update
> mechanism without requiring a re-install.

I agree - in fact, going from 5.5 to 5.6 just now updated only a couple
hundred rpms.  I would expect the beta->release transition to have even
less of an impact.

For example, I grabbed sl-release-5.6-1.i386.rpm and
yum-conf-56-1.SL.noarch.rpm from the 5.6 release directory, then 
rpm -Uvh'd them.  Check that all the repos you like are enabled 
(rpm will leave you nice .rpmsave files in /etc/yum.repo.d to remind 
you), then:

  yum clean all
  yum update -y yum rpm
  yum clean all
  rpm --rebuilddb
  yum update -y

If it didn't pick up a new kernel, you don't even need to reboot
afterwards, although it's probably a good idea just in case.


-- 
 	    Alec Habig, University of Minnesota Duluth Physics Dept.
	    		    [log in to unmask]
		       http://neutrino.d.umn.edu/~habig/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2