On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 14:06 -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On 06/22/2011 12:57 PM, S.Tindall wrote:
> > Troy/Connie:
> >
> > While updating from SL 5.5 to SL 5.6, yum with gpgcheck enabled
> > complained that anaconda was not signed:
> >
> > # cat /etc/redhat-release
> > Scientific Linux SL release 5.6 (Boron)
> >
> > # yum update anaconda anaconda-runtime
> > ...
> > Package anaconda-11.1.2.224-2.SL.x86_64.rpm is not signed
> >
> > I think the 32-bit version and both arch of anaconda-runtime are
> > unsigned, too.
> >
> >
> > Steve
> 
> I apologize for that.
> You were correct, anaconda and anaconda-runtime for both i368 and x86_64 
> were not signed.  We double checked and found patch for i386 was also 
> not signed.
> We have signed the packages, put them in the appropriate places, and 
> rebuild the appropriate yum repositories.  Everything should be working 
> again.
> Please remember that since I just barely did this, you will probrubly 
> have to run
>    yum clean all
> before yum see's the change.
> Thank You
> Troy Dawson

Yes, anaconda now updates without issues.

Thanks,

Steve