SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Package anaconda-11.1.2.224-2.SL.x86_64.rpm is not signed
From:
"S.Tindall" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:57:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Troy/Connie:

While updating from SL 5.5 to SL 5.6, yum with gpgcheck enabled
complained that anaconda was not signed:

# cat /etc/redhat-release
Scientific Linux SL release 5.6 (Boron)

# yum update anaconda anaconda-runtime
...
Package anaconda-11.1.2.224-2.SL.x86_64.rpm is not signed

I think the 32-bit version and both arch of anaconda-runtime are
unsigned, too.


Steve

ATOM RSS1 RSS2