I'm also worried that this means more effort in determining when something is a bugfix (so push out quickly) vs major changes so test with websites etc...

--
James Pulver
Information Technology Area Supervisor
LEPP Computer Group
Cornell University


-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Misc Things
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:11 AM
To: Dr Andrew C Aitchison
Cc: Phong Nguyen; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: {off topic} Firefox 5

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Phong Nguyen wrote:
<skip>

> I see a substantial upswing in corporate use of Opera
> (konqueror too ?).
>
> --
> Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison         Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
> [log in to unmask]   http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

True.

And "Release" is usually perceived and understood as a version of
software with significant changes from the previous version. The new
schedule based approach is fine, but they should not be calling it
"releases". It's rather a regular builds that address bugs and add
some new features.

I'm not sure i understand the "marketing" behind this approach.