SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Misc Things <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Misc Things <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:10:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Phong Nguyen wrote:
<skip>

> I see a substantial upswing in corporate use of Opera
> (konqueror too ?).
>
> --
> Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison         Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
> [log in to unmask]   http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

True.

And "Release" is usually perceived and understood as a version of
software with significant changes from the previous version. The new
schedule based approach is fine, but they should not be calling it
"releases". It's rather a regular builds that address bugs and add
some new features.

I'm not sure i understand the "marketing" behind this approach.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2