SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jun 2011 06:25:46 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Randy Evans wrote:

> I am in the process of converting a number of CentOS machines to
> Scientific Linux.
>
> We have several machines which use Heartbeat and DRBD and these
> packages were available for install from the default repository in
> CentOS 5.5 but are not available in SL 5.5.  I thought, except for a
> few extra packages SL adds to their build, both were recompilations of
> RHEL and would have the same base packages available.
>
> I know there are additional repositories that can be enabled which
> would provide Heartbeat and DRBD but I am confused as to why there is
> a difference in the base packages.

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/SRPMS/drbd/
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/drbd/
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/drbd/

are all dated 2010 but suggest that someone was working on this.

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2