SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:04:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
On 06/02/2011 01:51 PM, Chris Tooley wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I need sssd 1.5.x and 6.1 is supposed to have it.
>
> Unfortunately, it's not released yet, and trying to install sssd 1.5.x
> from 6rolling gives me a whole whackload of dependencies.. I figure it's
> best to just upgrade the system - is there any reason I should not
> upgrade to 6rolling?  Is there an accepted way of upgrading to 6rolling?
>
> Thanks for the help!
> -Chris

The quickest way to go to 6rolling.

i686:
rpm -Uvh 
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/os/Packages/sl-release-6.1-0.1.rolling.i686.rpm

x86_64:
rpm -Uvh 
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/os/Packages/sl-release-6.1-0.1.rolling.x86_64.rpm

and then do a
   yum update


I would only update to it on a test machine, not production.

If you were doing virtulization I wouldn't recommend going to SL 
6rolling.  Most of the packages that haven't passed our tests are 
virtulization packages.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2