SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:03:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Hello,
We're still having problems with one last rpm, qemu-kvm.
It's not that it doesn't build, it does build.  But it has different 
dependencies than I would like.

When comparing against a golden standard I get that the rpm is missing 
the following dependencies.

+libX11.so.6()(64bit)
+libXext.so.6()(64bit)
+libXfixes.so.3()(64bit)
+libXrandr.so.2()(64bit)
+libXrender.so.1()(64bit)
...
+libXfixes.so.3
+libXrandr.so.2
+libXrender.so.1

I've tried building it in mock with all those packages and their 
development packages installed.  I've tried building it on a real 
machine with almost every development package installed.
I've tried messing with the spec file to see if there is some 
configuration I can change.  I haven't put those packages in as 
dependencies in the spec file, because what I am more concerned is that 
qemu-kvm isn't using those files.

Long story short(er).
Has anyone been able to recompile qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.160.el6 and get it 
to include the dependancies I listed above?
If so, how?

If not, how important do people thing that these missing dependancies are?

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2